Back at the beginning of the millennium a woman on the island of Bornholm felt something in one of her breasts that wasn’t supposed to be there. I can’t imagine the agony this woman, her family and all others who have faced the threat of cancer, have gone through. But I’m pretty sure that all the women of Bornholm have found some consolation in the fact that the Danish health care system provides every citizen of the country with free and cutting-edge treatment. No matter what the illness. No matter what the price.
The Bornholmians have been told all their living years that even though they are geographically detached and pretty far away from the rest of the country out there in the Baltic Sea, equal treatment means equal treatment, so if anything is wrong with them and the expertise to cure it is somewhere to be found in the Kingdom, help is at hand.
But there’s something on Bornholm called ovre. I guess the best translation will be to ask you to think of the term ‘over there’ and then get lazy and just think of ‘over’. Ovre means ‘everything in Denmark that is not Bornholm’.
Bornholmians have a love/hate relationship with ovre. On one hand the island is in no way big enough to support itself. The amount of sunshine, smoked herring and granite just isn’t sufficient to keep 42,000 people self-sustained. Especially not the granite, since that would mean literally carving up the island piece by piece and exporting it to vain house-owners all over the world. On the other hand the island has been under Swedish, German, Soviet and Danish supremacy through the centuries, so even though peace has reigned in the last 64 years there’s still a great animosity towards everything and everyone from any ovre lurking around in the back of the Bornholmian brain.
The woman’s cancer was cured. But she lost one breast. She lost the breast because the freeze microscopy facilities needed to perform a breast preserving treatment was only available ovre and the doctors at Bornholm Central Hospital and the mayor of Bornholm County had agreed to not let ovre boast about their fancy equipment and steal their patients and therefore did not inform women with breast cancer about the possibilities modern treatment provide and their rights to choose freely from any facility in the country. Five women lost breasts unnecessarily before someone intervened.
And what happened then? How did Denmark cope with the fact that five women were mutilated in the name of Bornholmian hygge? The two doctors are still working at the same hospital. Their boss has commented on the incidents with only one word: “unfortunate”. The Bornholm County Mayor first stated that the decisions were made because the removal of the breasts improved the patients chances of survival, but that was immediately denied by the doctors from ovre. Then he changed his explanation to: “There was a waiting list for breast preserving treatment” but that was firmly refuted by several hospitals around Denmark. Then the mayor went silent, perhaps because the then Minister of Health stepped onto the scene and called the events “unacceptable and irresponsible” but apart from looking and sounding a bit upset – did nothing.
The five women each received compensation averaging 34,000 kroner. That’s about 4,000 euro or 6,400 dollars or a tad more than the average Dane earns per month. Or what a cancer specialist earns in a week at Bornholm Central Hospital. Quite a bargain – one breast for one month’s pay. That’s the amount that says: “something was wrong” but not nearly enough to say “something was very, very wrong”.
Apart from that – nothing happened. There were no angry letters from citizens to politicians. There was no public outcry demanding those responsible should be held accountable. The mayor still enjoys a blossoming political career. The then Minister of Health is now our Prime Minister. And the Danish Cancer Society – whose expressed purpose is to “ensure optimal conditions for those living with cancer and its consequences” called the amount of compensation “adequate”.
But what about Danish society as a whole? I suppose it could be considered a civilized reaction to this wretched state of affairs to refrain from anger and just make sure that nothing like this could ever happen again by giving the whole health care system a thorough going over. But going over systems means changing systems and we know how Danes respond to change, don’t we? Change compromises hygge. NEVER, EVER compromise the hygge.
So Danes did the opposite of reducing the problem with local patriotism. They scaled it up and took it nationwide. Last year the European Commission had to threat the Danish government with sanctions for not allowing all Danes to use their right to seek the best possible treatment anywhere in the EU. Several cancer patients died after being declared incurable by the Danish health system even though both German and Swedish hospitals were able to treat them.
The Danes’ reaction to this? Nothing.
Because nothing must disturb the hallowed ground of hygge. Not even death.
19 Comments

18 Comments
Is this for real? Is there no sense of justice in DK?
This sounds like the way Libya handles the problem with AIDS. Deny, deny, deny – and if children in hospitals have AIDS they put the doctors and nurses in prison since that must mean that they have infected the children. Absurd logic is not a Danish hallmark.
Hi Peter
I’m a long-standing fan of your analysis of the absurdities of Denmark and the bullshit Daniods . I honestly believe that Denmark would be a better place for everybody if a good part of us – the Daniods – took a stand on some of the issues you raise and decided actively to change behaviour. The issues of intolerance, double standards, and hostile attitude to anyone or anything that does look like røget ørred med røræg og Rød Ålborg would be a good place to start. So would a coordinated effort to reclaim the term of “Danish” (and maybe even the awful “Danishness”) by using the terms in connection with things we are actually proud of as Danes instead of letting the xenophobes monopolize these terms by using the opposite terms to describe what they don’t like.
But this time, I respectfully disagree with your analysis. Your first go at pointing out the dark side of Hygge was gifted. It is scary when the risk of compromising Hygge is used as an pseudo argument that cancels any attempt at moving forward, much as Colbert’s Truthiness is a threat to all real logic- and fact-based discussions. The sad story from Bornholm above of the consequences of incompetence, local patriotism, and reluctance to change and development is indeed upsetting, but I don’t accept your assertion that the Danes’ fondness of Hygge was the reason for this miserable situation.
Instead, I claim that many Danes simply just have lost interest in the lives, health, and well-being of people outside their circle of acquaintances (assuming that they once did). As a people, we have grown too indolent (and too concerned about house equities) to be able to muster the effort to thoroughly think through and change things. I also claim that a contributing factor is powerlessness caused by the ever-growing complexity of how things are organised: Danes seems to have lost the ability to reorganise a system that doesn’t work, instead we add corrections to the system (and second order corrections to these), and after adding a few layers of corrections, seeing the big picture is no longer possible. With the important issues no longer within reach, we are distracted by questions that do not require much (if any) analysis or comprehensive views of society.
I think we need revolutions rather than corrections.
Good analysis, Sor. I think a lot of the complacency that is going on is totally tied to myopic world views and just too much self absorption.
Sor, you are completely right, and the example does not at all support the massive conclusion.
Hi Peter. I just last week started my own blog about the Danes and their ways. I’ve never actually read nor written a blog, so I don’t know whether I can advertise mine here.
Anyway, I find your blog very inspiring, and I’m certainly planning on reading the whole thing! Well done.
But what did that women do after all? Just accepted those coins? Did they enter in justice against doctors and State? Is hygge so big that even the victims stay quiet? You said in the first part that there isn’t a good translation for Hygge. Well, it seems that you could translate it as “Zombieness”. However, I can’t say much about this issue because my country has worse problems in healthcare… despite private medicine here is fantastic, very, very good, the public health system is broken – Brazil has tried to copy the welfare state of the nordic countries, but forgot that 90% of the population doesn’t pay taxes enough to sustain such a system. Only private medicine really works (very well) here.
@sor: I see your point as far as mere hygge not being able to explain why things went so horribly wrong on Bornholm. Things like this could happen in any other country, I guess. But I do think that the addiction to hygge explains what happened after the events: nothing! Danes didn’t change their views and ways in the aftermath to prevent this from ever happening again. The result is that it did happen again – even in a larger scale. And changes still haven’t happened.
I see no other explanation for this than hygge.
@Ebbe: good to have you back. Still in Bolivia?
@Mark: Welcome to the Blogosphere! And you are very welcome to advertise your new blog here, but be aware: not every blogger out there is as generous as me
P.
In this case, “hygge” would be correctly translated as apathy.
Thanks, Peter. My blog is at http://www.speakdanish.dk/kultur/
All the best, Mark
Sor – That was very well put.
I also agree with Peter about the aftermath of the Bornholm incident and I have also always felt that hygge is many parts apathy. I think the lack of a real aftermath for the incident can also be attributed to the fact that Danes do not like to criticize and make a fuss with regard to their own system. I’ve sometimes sensed that Danes feel that the system is a reflection of themselves and to point the finger is to turn the finger to themselves and that is simply NOT tolerable. They pride themselves on the kind of diplomacy that is paralyzing. Navel gazers more content to cool-ly contemplate than to revolutionize because underneath it all Danes don’t have a whole lot of faith in their ability to “get it right”. What if the revolution fails? Wouldn’t it just be better to have a mediocre system than to risk failure? The arrogance is just the Napoleon complex.
Peter,
Thank you for your entertaining and very clever blog topic on “Hygge”. I simply loved your comment “Change compromises hygge. NEVER, EVER compromise the hygge.” I will be sure to send your blog weblink to my Danish friends. I think they too will enjoy what you have to say and I’m positive the will share their opinions with you and your readers.
– Jules
Strange…and I was thinking the healthcare system in Denmark is pretty good. Well, its good, but some things have to be improved…
Still, its much better than the situation in other countries. Private hospitals make a new situation: more money – better treatment…which is bad. Every human being should have the best treatment option!
@Victoria…. where on earth did you get the idea that the Danish health system is great or merely good? In the world rank it is number 34 and in Europe number 23. Is that based on what you are told in the press? Or is that the usual response from Danes…. oh it is so great here, we are so good at everything, we are well educated and so on? And the it is free. No it is not. It is paid for by taxes. I don’t think you have lived abroad and experiences another health care system.
And I am sorry, Peter, as for cutting edge – you really gotta kidding yourself. Especially when it comes to cancer treatment does Denmark lack behind.
The waiting lists are a nightmare. A&E truly from a horror film, in-effective and slow.
When my sister told me what care she recieved when she had children I am so happy I had mine in the UK. When I had a lump in my breast I was seen byt the consultant (that is a specialised doctor) the very next day to start the treatment immidiately.
I really don’t understand why people in Denmark believe the toss in the press about how great it is. I have had better treatment in Morocco and following 18 years in the UK I would at any time go back to the UK if I needed proper treatment. It is also free there.
you guys suck! danmark is the place to be!
Dear Peter, I stumbled across your report while looking for the correct spelling of “hygge”! As a pathologist, I’m appalled at this story of women being denied appropriate cancer care, and I’d like to know more. How did you find out about it? Can you point me at the reports from the mayyor and the hospital (I know I’ll have to find a translator, but I work at a University medical school so it shouldn’t be impossible.)
regards
Pat Harkin
Enjoyed and got ‘edgamcated’. Not hygge but best a ‘Hoosier’ can come up with.
Really enjoying insights from a different culture.
Thank you again.
DJ
ps sending you sunshine and warmth. 92 degrees here.
;-}
Florida, USA
I am amazed that the people of Bornholm in particular and Denmark in general are so passive about their preventative health care. I thought that the none-complaining, passive, British were the only nation not to want to ‘rock the boat’ Certain items of health care, here, are a Postcode lottery and we just accept it as regional social deprivation.
Incidentally, can anyone tell me if there is a Roman Catholic Church on the island of Bornholm and where it is? Please? Many thanks.
Tinkelpeg.
One Trackback
[...] See original here: Holy Hygge (part 2) – Downsides Of Denmark [...]